Developing a Conceptual Model of Gullibility Based on Islamic Sources

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 . PhD Candidate in General Psychology, Research Institute of Hawzah and University, Qom, Iran (Corresponding Author).

2 . Associate Professor, Department of Education, Research Institute of Islamic Sciences and Culture, Qom, Iran.

3 Level 3 student of Al-Zahra community

Abstract

This study aims to develop a conceptual model of gullibility based on Islamic sources. Understanding the concept of gullibility is essential in human nature and falls within the domain of social cognition, as gullibility distorts and weakens an individual's perception of judgments and decision-making. The research method follows a qualitative content analysis approach based on the conventional and directed content analysis of Shey and Shannon. To achieve this, all verses of the Quran and narrations were examined by identifying semantic analysis units, and the data related to gullibility were coded in three stages using qualitative content analysis. The findings indicate that, according to Islamic sources, five main components were identified and inferred: rapid acceptance, rapid change, susceptibility to deception, lack of prudence, and neglect of evil, which were derived from the concepts of folly (safāha), stupidity (ḥumq), and naivety (balah). The developed model highlights that factors such as ignorance, lack of wisdom, disbelief, and the absence of social awareness facilitate gullibility. Upon analyzing these core concepts, which form the central structure of the present model, it was determined that folly and stupidity play the primary roles, while naivety reinforces gullibility. Therefore, in interpersonal relationships, the priority should be addressing the underlying factors to prevent gullibility.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. Azdī, ‘Alī, Kitāb al-Mā’ (The Book of Water), 1st Edition, Tehran: Dānishgāh-i ‘Ulūm-i Pizishkī-yi Īrān – Mu’assasah-yi Muṭāla’āt-i Tārīkh-i Pizishkī, Ṭibb-i Islāmī va Mukammil (Iran University of Medical Sciences – Institute for the Study of Medical History, Islamic and Complementary Medicine), 1387 SH (2008 CE).
  2. Azharī, Moḥammad, Tahdhīb al-Lughah (The Refinement of Language), 1st Edition, Beirut: Dār Iḥyā’ al-Turāth al-‘Arabī (House for the Revival of Arab Heritage), 1421 AH (2000 CE).
  3. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115. 2008.
  4. Farāhīdī, Khalīl, Kitāb al-‘Ayn (The Book of ‘Ayn), 2nd Edition, Qom: Nashr-i Hijrat (Hijrat Publications), 1409 AH (1988 CE).
  5. Ḥāfiẓī, Moḥammad, Model-i Mafhūmī-yi Markazīyat Bakhshī-yi Nābahang bih Khud dar Manābi’-i Islāmī (Conceptual Model of Abnormal Self-Centering in Islamic Sources), Master’s Thesis, Mu’assasah-yi Akhlāq va Tarbīyat (Institute of Ethics and Education), Qom, 1399 SH (2020 CE).
  6. Hāshimī, ‘Abbās; Mash’ashī, Sayyid Moḥammad; and Furūghī, Dāryūsh, “Ta’thīr-i Ikhtilāf-hā-yi Fardī-yi Ḥassās-barsān bar Ta’ahhud-i Ḥirfah-’ī-yi Ānhā: Barrasī-yi Naqsh-i Miyānjī-yi Sāzgārī-yi Jaw-i Akhlāqī” (The Effect of Individual Differences in Sensitizers on Their Professional Commitment: Examining the Mediating Role of Ethical Climate Adaptation), Faṣlnāmah-yi Barrasī-hā-yi Ḥisābdārī va Ḥisābrasī (Accounting and Auditing Reviews Quarterly), Vol. 25, No. 9, pp. 415-432, 1397 SH (2018 CE).
  7. B. R. & Olson, M.H. Introduction to learning theory. Translated by Ali
    Akbar Saif. 7 ED. Tehran: Doran publish. (In Persian). 2007.
  8. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288. 2005.
  9. Ibn Bābawayh, Moḥammad, Man Lā Yaḥḍuruh al-Faqīh (For Whom There Is No Jurist Present), 2nd Edition, Qom: Daftar-i Intishārāt-i Islāmī (Islamic Publications Office affiliated with the Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom), 1413 AH (1992 CE).
  10. Ibn Durayd, Moḥammad, Jamharat al-Lughah (The Collection of Language), 1st Edition, Beirut: Dār al-‘Ilm lil-Malāyīn (House of Knowledge for Millions), 1988 CE.
  11. Ibn Fāris, Aḥmad, Mu’jam Maqāyīs al-Lughah (The Dictionary of Language Standards), 1st Edition, Qom: Maktab al-A’lām al-Islāmī (Islamic Information Office), 1404 AH (1984 CE).
  12. Ibn Manẓūr, Moḥammad, Lisān al-‘Arab (The Tongue of the Arabs), 3rd Edition, Beirut: Dār Ṣādir (Dar Sader Publications), 1414 AH (1993 CE).
  13. Ibn Shu’bah Ḥarrānī, Ḥasan, Tuḥaf al-‘Uqūl (Gifts of the Intellects), 2nd Edition, Qom: Jāmi’ah-yi Mudarrisīn (Society of Seminary Teachers), 1404 AH (1984 CE).
  14. Jawharī, Ismā’īl, Al-Ṣiḥāḥ (The Correct), 1st Edition, Beirut: Dār al-‘Ilm lil-Malāyīn (House of Knowledge for Millions), 1376 AH (1956 CE).
  15. Joseph P. Forgas and Roy F. Baumeister .The Social Psychology of Gullibility Fake News, Conspiracy Theories, and Irrational Beliefs.
  16. Kāviyānī, Moḥammad, Ravān Shināsī dar Qur’ān (Psychology in the Quran), Qom: Intishārāt-i Pazhūhishgāh-i Ḥawzah va Dānishgāh (Publications of the Research Center of Islamic Seminary and University), 1393 SH (2014 CE).
  17. Kulaynī, Moḥammad ibn Ya’qūb, Uṣūl al-Kāfī (The Principles of the Sufficient), Translated by Muṣṭafavī, 1st Edition, Tehran: Kitāb Fūrūshī-yi ‘Ilmīyah Islāmīyah (Islamic Scientific Bookstore), 1369 SH (1990 CE).
  18. Kulaynī, Moḥammad, Al-Kāfī (The Sufficient), 4th Edition, Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmīyah (Islamic Books Publishing House), 1407 AH (1986 CE).
  19. Madanī Shīrāzī, ‘Alī, Al-Ṭirāz al-Awwal wa al-Kunāz li-mā ‘Alayhi min Lughat al-‘Arab al-Ma’ūl (The First Embroidery and the Treasure of Reliable Arabic Language), 1st Edition, Mashhad: Mu’assasah Āl al-Bayt^ li-Iḥyā’ al-Turāth (Aal al-Bayt Institute for the Revival of Heritage), 1384 SH (2005 CE).
  20. Makārim Shīrāzī, Nāṣir, Tafsīr-i Nimūnah (The Example Commentary), 1st Edition, Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmīyah (Islamic Books Publishing House), 1374 SH (1995 CE).
  21. Mūsā, Ḥusayn Ya’qūb, Al-Ifṣāḥ (The Clarification), 4th Edition, Qom: Maktab al-A’lām al-Islāmī (Islamic Information Office), 1410 AH (1989 CE).
  22. Muṣṭafawī, Ḥasan, Al-Taḥqīq fī Kalimāt al-Qur’ān al-Karīm (The Investigation into the Words of the Noble Quran), 3rd Edition, Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmīyah – Markaz-i Nashr-i Āthār-i ‘Allāmah Muṣṭafawī (House of Scientific Books – Center for Publishing the Works of Allamah Mustafavi), 1430 AH (2009 CE).
  23. patton, M. Q. How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Newbury: Sage, 1987.
  24. Sālārī Far, Moḥammad Riḍā; Āẕarbāyjānī, Mas’ūd; Kāviyānī Ārānī, Moḥammad; Mūsavī Aṣl, Moḥammad, Ravān Shināsī-yi Ijtimā’ī bā Nigarish bih Manābi’-i Islāmī (Social Psychology with a View to Islamic Sources), Qom: Pazhūhishgāh-i Ḥawzah va Dānishgāh (Research Center of Islamic Seminary and University), 1398 SH (2019 CE).
  25. Shaybānī, Abū ‘Amr, Kitāb al-Jīm (The Book of Jīm), 1st Edition, Cairo: Al-Hay’ah al-‘Āmmah li-Shu’ūn al-Maṭābi’ al-Amīrīyah (General Organization for Government Printing Offices), 1975 CE.
  26. Ṭabāṭabā’ī, Moḥammad Ḥusayn, Al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān (The Balance in the Interpretation of the Quran), 5th Edition, Qom: Daftar-i Intishārāt-i Islāmī (Islamic Publications Office of the Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom), 1417 AH (1996 CE).
  27. Ṭabāṭabā’ī, Moḥammad Ḥusayn, Tafsīr al-Mīzān (The Balance in Interpretation), Translated by Moḥammad Bāqir Mūsavī Hamadānī, Qom: Daftar-i Intishārāt-i Islāmī (Islamic Publications Office of the Society of Seminary Teachers), 1374 SH (1995 CE).
  28. Tabrīzī, Muṣṭafā, Taḥlīl-i Muḥtavā-yi Kayfī az Manẓar-i Rūykard-hā-yi Qiyāsī va Istiqrā’ī (Qualitative Content Analysis from the Perspective of Deductive and Inductive Approaches), ‘Ulūm-i Ijtimā’ī (Social Sciences Journal), No. 64, pp. 105-138, 1393 SH (2014 CE).

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 13 July 2024
  • Revise Date: 15 August 2024
  • Accept Date: 27 January 2025

Share

How to cite

Statistics