The Model Definition of “Educational Interpretation

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Ph.D. student of the theology department of Payam Noor University, Iran. Email: fazadi5263@student pnu ac ir

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Theology, Payam Noor University, Iran, email nsernoor@pnu.ac.ir:

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Theology, Payam Noor University, Iran, email: mfsby@pnu.ac.ir

Abstract

Educational interpretation is one of the types of scientific interpretation that researchers and thinkers of Qur’anic sciences and interpretation have paid much attention to in recent decades and have researched, discussed, and commented on its various sections and topics.
One of these sections and topics is the definition of educational interpretation, which some researchers have tried so far in this field, and each of them has given a specific definition for it based on their understanding of the word “تربیت” (education). These definitions can draw different meanings, topics, territories, and tasks for educational interpretation. On the one hand, due to their contradictions and on the other hand, due to the lack of complete compliance with the logical and strategic criteria of the definition, these definitions are open to criticism and contain many. Correcting these flaws requires drawing correct criteria for defining educational interpretation.
Intending to eliminate the flaws of past definitions and achieve a more comprehensive and correct framework for defining educational interpretation, the author provides a model for the definition of educational interpretation which is more efficient than the previous definitions and can be the basis for explaining and drawing the structure, nature, and geometry of educational interpretation.
In this regard, the writer concludes that the correct definition of the term “تفسیر تربیتی” (educational interpretation) is based on the correct understanding and analysis of the word “تربیت,” which can be achieved by removing the general meaning from its scope and defining it as “specialized education knowledge” can correctly clarify the topic, scope, purpose and main tasks of educational interpretation.

Keywords

References

  1. A’rafi et al., An Introduction to Islamic Education: Philosophy of Education (Vol. 1), Tehran, SAMT, 2013.
  2. A’rafi, Ali Reza; Benari, Ali Hemmat; Rezaei Isfahani, Mohammad Ali, Suggestion and Conceptology and Metaphysics of Educational Interpretation of the Quran, Quran and Science, Vol. 3, 2008, pp. 9-22.
  3. A’rafi, Ali Reza; Benari, Ali Hemmat; Rezaei Isfahani, Mohammad Ali, An Introduction to Educational Interpretation, Qom, Ishraq and Irfan Cultural Institute, 2012.
  4. A’rafi, Alireza, Jurisprudence of al-Turbiyah, a New Theory in Islamic Sciences, Ma’rifat, No. 104, 2006, pp. 11-17.
  5. Abdus Salam, Zain al-Abidin, Imam Khomeini’s Methodology in Tafsir, Book of Contemporary Islamic Cases, Book III, Qom, 1418.
  6. Abu Khamsin, Hashim, Educational Exegesis; Foundations and Perspectives, Volume 1, Qom, Al-Mustafa International University, 1432 A.H.
  7. Amin Khandaqi, Maqsood, Education Interpretation as a Scientific Discipline, Islamic Education, 14th Year, Number 28, Summer 2019.
  8. Anwar Al-Baz, Educational Interpretation in the Holy Quran, Cairo, Universities Books Press, 2007.
  9. Aqiqi Bakshaishi, Abdur Rahim, Classes of Shia Commentators, Qom, Navid Islam, 2008.
  10. Asa’adi, Ali, Educational Interpretation, Its Nature and Its Components, Qom: Research Institute of Quranic Culture and Education, First Edition, 2020.
  11. Asa’sdi, Mohammad, Pathology of Interpretive Currents (Vol. 1), Qom, Hawzah Research Institute and University, 1st Edition, 2010.
  12. Ayazi, Seyyed Mohammad Ali, The Biographies of Interpreters and Their Methods, Tehran, Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, 1994.
  13. Behjatpour, Abdul Kareem, The Skills of Expressing Interpretation in the Surahs of the Holy Quran, Qom, Tahmid Foundation, 2018.
  14. Ehsani, Mohammad, Hemmat Benari, Principles and Methods of Education in Islam, Isfahan, Isfahan University, 2008.
  15. Faramorz Qaramaliki, Ahad, Methodology of Religious Studies, Mashhad, University of Islamic Sciences, Razavi, 2016.
  16. Hashemi Aliabadi Seyyed Ahmad, Methodology of Educational Interpretation, Ma’rifat, No. 100, 2013, pp. 2-5.
  17. Hassani, Mohammad; Navid Adham, Mehdi, Tarbiat or Education and Tarbiat, which one?, Research Journal of Education and Training, Year 2, Number 2, 2012, pp. 39-56
  18. Herest, Bell, Peters, Richard; The Logic of Education, Translated by Farhad Karimi, Tehran, Scientific and Cultural Publications, 2009.
  19. Ibn Ashur, Mohammad bin Tahir, Al-Tahrir wa al-Tanvir, N.p., n.d.
  20. Ibn Hayyan, Jabir, Al-Hudud (The Definitions), Edited by Paul Kraus, Cairo: Al-Khanji School, 1354 A.H.
  21. Ifshagar Zabih, Ahmad, Pathology of Quran Interpretation and Educational Interpretations. Quran and Science, Autumn and Winter 2008.
  22. Lisani Fisharaki, Mohammad Ali, Tafsir Rouhani, Tehran, Urouj Publishing House, 2007
  23. Ma’amouri, Ali, Tafsir wa Adzanuh, Encyclopaedia of the Holy Quran, Qom Bustan Kitab, 2010.
  24. Muaddab, Reza, Abu Khamsin, Hashim, A Introduction to Foundations of Educational Interpretation, Quran and Science, Volume 3, pp. 2008, pp. 104-122.
  25. Mughniyyah, Mohammad Javad, Tafsir al-Kashif, Tehran, Dar al-Kutub al-Islamiyyah, First: 1424 A.H.
  26. Najjarzadegan, Fathullah, Comparative Interpretation, Qom, World Center for Islamic Sciences, 2004.
  27. Paketchi, Ahmad, Research Method, Tehran: Imam Sadiq University, 2010, Second Edition
  28. Rashid Reza, Mohammad, Tafsir al-Manar, Beirut, Dar al-Ma’rifah, n.d.
  29. Rezaei Isfahani, Mohammad Ali, Logic of Quran Interpretation, Qom, Al-Mustafa International Univeristy, 2006.
  30. Rezaei Isfahani, Mohammad Ali, Tafsir of Surah Hamd, Quran and Science, Autumn and Winter 2008- Number 3.
  31. Shafi’zadeh, Marziyyah; Baharzadeh, Parveen; Fattahizadeh, Fathiyyah, Semantics of the Word in the Holy Quran Based on the Relations of Association and Succession, Quran and Hadith Research Studies, Volume 47, Number 1 Spring and Summer 2013.
  32. Shakir, Mohammad Kazim, Basics and Methods of Interpretation, Qom, World Center for Islamic Sciences, 2003.
  33. Soroush, Abdul Karim, Ethic of Gods, Tehran, Tarh Naw, 2001.
  34. Suyuti, Jalal al-Din, Al-Itqan fi Ulum al-Quran, Beirut, Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 1411 A.H.
  35. Tabatabai, Seyyed Mohammad Hossein, Al-Mizan fi al-Tafsir al-Quran, Translated by Seyyed Mohammad Baqir Mousavi Hamdani, vol.5, Qom, Jamia Modarrisin Publishing House,1995.
  36. Talibzadeh Nobarian, Mohsen; Mirlo, Mohammad Mahdi; Mousavi, Seyyed Hossein, A Reflection on Bertrand Russell’s Thoughts, Research Journal of Education and Training, Year 1, Number 2, 2011, pp. 59-82.
  37. Vijdani, Fatimeh, the Position and Limits of Analytical and Normative Interpretations of Reflection in Some Existing Definitions, Research on Islamic Education, Issues, No. 22, 2014, pp. 115-144.
  38. Yazidi, Behzad and Mohammad Ali Tajari, The Definition of Educational Interpretation, Based on Methodology in Interpretations and Educational Sciences, Quranic Research Quarterly, No. 80, Fall 2016.
  39. Zarkashi, Mohammad bin Bahadur, Al-Burhan fi Ulum al-Qaruan, Beirut: Dar al-Ma’rifah, 1410 A.H.

 

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 28 June 2022
  • Revise Date: 15 October 2022
  • Accept Date: 04 December 2022

Share

How to cite

Statistics